|
THE VALUE OF DOING NOTHING
Nothing from nothing
leaves nothing
You gotta have something if you wanna be with me …
Don't you remember I told ya, I'm a soldier
In the war on poverty, yeah
-- “Nothing from Nothing,” 1974
-- Billy Preston & Bruce Fisher
When Hannibal crossed the Alps, invaded Italy and
inflicted a disastrous defeat on the Romans at Lake Trasimene in 217
B.C. the Romans had their backs to the wall. They elected Quintus
Fabius Maximus dictator, unchallengeable general of all their
armies, and he immediately got busy doing – nothing. He knew
that Hannibal’s supply line stretched all the way back to Carthage.
Time was on his side, and against Hannibal. All Fabius needed to do
was harass Hannibal, cut his supply line, and wait for Hannibal to
make a mistake. The longer he waited, the more certainly Hannibal
would run out of supplies and make some mistake. By waiting Fabius
robbed Hannibal of the advantage of the offense, and forced him
(with his weaker forces) on the defensive, unable to concentrate and
use his forces to their full advantage.
It took fourteen long years, but Fabius won by
waiting. Because of this performance Fabius was awarded the surname
“Cunctator” – the Delayer. Ennius wrote, “Unus homo nobis
cunctado restituit rem” – One man by delaying restored our
fortunes.[1]
At the first, however, he was not so popular. The
party in Rome that demanded immediate action accused him of every
failing from stupidity to cowardice. Fabius’ genius lay in ignoring
them, and doing nothing.
Like every other successful general in history, Fabius
knew the possibility of victory always improves when you pick the
time, ground, and occasion of the battle, forcing the enemy to react
to you. Doing nothing until conditions run your way stacks the deck
in your favour. In short, doing nothing works far better
than doing something, until the right opportunity appears.
THERE’S DOING NOTHING,
AND THEN THERE’S DOING NOTHING
Modern life has made us all victims of a metastasised
version of the Protestant work ethic. Rather than making work
redemptive, it makes it all-consumptive. It whips us constantly to
keep us slaving – keep busy there, don’t stop. This perverted work
ethic sends us down the wrong road, both in human and strategic
terms. There come times when doing anything is worse
than doing nothing.
Actually, there are several kinds of “doing nothing.”
Often doing nothing amounts only to waiting for our dispositions to
bear their fruit. But the “doing nothing” I mean is never born from
lack of imagination or paralysis or cowardice. We deliberately
choose it as the response best fitted to our circumstances. It is
not a merely passive strategy, but an active choice
DOING NOTHING AS AN INVESTMENT STRATEGY
At first glance it may sound like the stupidest thing
in the world, but doing nothing often ranks as the very best
investment strategy possible. “Doing nothing” appears less stupid
when compared to “doing something wrong.” Contrast, for example,
“doing nothing” with “making a big mistake and losing a lot of
money.”
Obviously I don’t mean that doing nothing is always
the best long term strategy. If you sit back and do nothing
forever, your assets will quietly shrink and wither on the vine.
This is especially true for US dollar denominated assets, because
the US dollar is in a primary downtrend and will remain in that
primary downtrend for a long, long time.
Nor do I mean “doing nothing” motivated by cowardice,
fear, or mere want of any better idea. Rather, when no attractive
investment choice presents itself – when every alternative looks
brown around the edges and promises only a small return – you will
gain a far greater return by simply doing nothing. Wait
patiently for a genuinely profitable opportunity that offers high
rewards with low risk.
Contrast this strategy with what many investment
advisers promoting today: “Always stay invested” or “Buy and
hold.” Neither of these equals a strategy of “doing nothing.”
“Always stay invested” offers a strategy of sure
impoverishment. It demands that no matter how good the risk-reward
ratio a particular investment offers, no matter how bad the outlook
for a stock or commodity or industry or economy, my money has to be
invested somewhere. To that common sense can only reply, ‘Hogwash,”
but “common sense” and “investment adviser” don’t necessarily walk
together.
The only strategy more certain to impoverish you than
“always stay invested” is “buy and hold.” As of last month,
following that strategy since January 2000 has eaten up your capital
to the tune of 24% in the Dow, 39% in the S&P 500, 63% in the Nasdaq
Comp, and 71% in the Nasdaq 100. “Buy and fold’ they ought to
call it.
ROTTEN OPPORTUNITIES
Lately the stock market gave us another example of a
rotten opportunity. Because stocks jumped after Gulf War I, Wall
Street’s stock touts (a.k.a. “analysts”) expected stocks to repeat
that performance after Gulf War II. Obligingly, they jumped into
stocks with all their clients’ money. Had you bought the Dow at the
7,524.06 low on March 11, 2003 by today (with the Dow at about
8,500) you would have gained about 13%
But think about buying stocks on March 11. You were
investing against the primary downtrend (hoping stocks would swim
upstream faster than the current was carrying them downstream) with
the technical possibility of a drop to 6,500 or lower, a 15% loss.
To my mind, a roughly equal chance of losing or
gaining 15% doth not an attractive investment make. This is drawing
to an inside straight. Rather than take that risk, I would far
prefer to do nothing, and sit still collecting a measly 3% in a
money market fund (not to mention holding silver or gold in a
primary uptrend).
SWEET OPPORTUNITIES
Compare the risk of the stock investment I’ve
described above to what I recommended in my last Special Alert
(Nudge). Silver and gold appeared to have completed their reaction
down from gold’s $380 high. Spot prices stood at $329.80 and
$4.40. I recommended buying Dec. 2004 silver call options with a
$6.00 strike price. They cost $600 – 650, depending on how fast
your acted on the recommendation.
The option is good until November 2004, 22 months away
(at the time). The option’s strike price is $6.00, so the option
doesn’t break ‘in the money” until silver reaches $6.00, although it
starts rising long, long before that. Past $6.00 it participates
dollar for dollar with any rise in silver’s price. At $7.00 silver,
below the 1998 $7.80 high, the option would be worth $5,000; at
$8.00 silver, $10,000. So we are risking $650 for a potential
reward of $5,000, roughly a 750% reward/risk ratio.
And we are giving the market plenty of time – 22
months – to make us right.
And we are riding with the primary trend, not
against it.
PATIENT WAITING
But great opportunities don’t come along every day, so
we have to be willing to do nothing, biding our time while we wait
for them to appear. Likewise, once we have made an investment we
have to wait patiently for it to work. Markets move up in three
rises or degrees. In the first phase -- before the public grasps
the opportunity -- a bull market gains at a very slow pace. In the
second the ascending angle increases as the public hops on.
Finally, in the last stage, the market rises straight up because
“everybody” knows it will keep going up forever. To reap the
biggest harvest, you have to fade the public. When they
sell, you buy; when they buy, you sell.
If you have already bought your gold and silver
position, doing nothing now means waiting patiently for the bull
market to unfold. By now you ought also to have positioned yourself
on the right side of the US dollar (short with the primary
downtrend) and stocks (short with the primary downtrend).
(If you still own stocks, even in an IRA, you are drawing to an
inside straight. You have stacked all the cards against
yourself.) Having made your investment, now you can only
wait patiently, watching the signs to make sure the primary trend
hasn’t changed.
It’s beginning to turn out that “doing nothing” isn’t
really as unoccupied as onlookers might assume.
ANOTHER KIND OF DOING NOTHING
If you’ve ever met or spoken with my wife, you know
she is a wonderful person. However, she has a small blind spot
where I am concerned. Whenever she walks into a room where I am
huddled over a book reading, she shortly will say, “Since
you’re not doing anything . . .” and assign me some errand.
I will grant that while reading I am not making much
noise, nor are my arms and legs moving violently. But I dispute
that mere lack of physical motion correctly leads to the inference
that I am “doing nothing.” To Susan it appears that I am not
working, but actually my mind is running in high gear, working at
its highest speed, even if I’m reading nothing but P.J. O’Rourke.
In fact, strong doses of P.J. O’Rourke tend to make me work much
better, even though they have little or nothing to do with the gold
and silver markets.
To Susan, my reading is ‘doing nothing.” Maybe your
fishing or napping looks that way to your wife. Or maybe her
shopping or folding clothes looks that way to you. But you see,
“doing nothing’ accomplishes quite a bit, because it’s exactly when
we pick up and ponder new ideas and apply old ones to new places.
It only looks like we’re doing nothing.
THE LAST KIND OF DOING NOTHING
There’s one last kind of doing nothing that differs
from the others. Times come when doing anything is
positively wrong, positively wasteful, positively stupid, and
positively premature. At those times you can only do your nearest
duties, building the future and waiting for history to unfold.
There’s no help for it. Things must run their course to a bitter
end we can do nothing to avert.
You can imagine that I fret quite a bit about the
world I see around me. Corruption in the church leaves me furious.
The tyranny building in civil government alarms and enrages me.
Most of all I abhor the lethargy and laziness and inability to think
on the part of those whose job it is to keep those institutions
honest – the people of this country.
I get anxious. I fret and chafe. I want to do
something.
To be honest, I’d be more worried about myself
if I could view that rottenness without resenting it. The
man who can look at it without revulsion is a moral monster. At the
same time, God has placed limits on my jurisdiction. Some things
are simply beyond my power to fix.
That’s when you have to turn things around and look at
them another way.
“When I thought to know this, it was too painful for
me: until I went into the sanctuary of God; then understood I their
end. Surely thou didst set them in slippery places.”
[2]
From this angle you don’t see how fast the world is
going to hell in a handbasket, but how surely God is working
out all his holy will. And he works it out in all the ways that the
mighty despise, not in grand crusades and world-saving blows, but in
the love of a husband for his wife, in raising children, in doggedly
fulfilling our duty day by day, in patiently building the kingdom of
Christ by lifting one brick at a time, purposefully putting it into
place, and then scraping out the excess of mortar until the joint is
perfect – in all the ways that the too-busy world calls “doing
nothing.”
If you are unwilling to do this first, then all
your mighty world-saving, all your crusades amount to so much bunk
and posturing. If you are unaware that sometimes you can do this
only, then you will waste your efforts.
So as a faithful friend of mine reminds me when our
present situation’s irretrievability stirs me up too much, I ought
to forget all that and go do nothing with my wife. At times, it is
positively better to do nothing than something. It is positively
better to hug your wife, to go for a walk with her, to play with
your children, to read or fish or nap than to ride off in the sunset
to crusade against the world’s incurable folly.
Because however much the world believes you are doing
nothing, however much you might think you’re doing nothing,
you’re actually doing the most important thing in the world.
-- F. Sanders
[1]
Encyclopaedia Britannica, London: Encyclopaedia Britannica,
Inc., 1965. “Fabius,” Vol. 9, p. 22 & “Hannibal,” vol. 11, p.
66.
Back to the previous
page
|